Mixed teams, modeled honestly.
Pods that include both humans and agents, with the work distribution between them visible at a glance.
The map of who does what — humans and agents on the same canvas.
Headcount planning shouldn't end where the org chart ends. Node renders humans and agents on the same workforce map, with the work each one is responsible for and the cost of doing it.
The chart that makes humans and agents legible to each other, on the same axis.
Pods that include both humans and agents, with the work distribution between them visible at a glance.
How much of lead-to-cash is human-served vs. agent-served? What's the cost-to-serve in each mix? Click to drill in.
Hiring plans that account for what AI is already doing — instead of last year's plan plus a guess.
Three behaviours that turn a workforce surface from a headcount table into a planning tool.
Lead-Qual Pod has 8 humans and 3 agents. The agents handle volume; the humans handle exceptions. The pod's cost-to-serve is one number. Hiring questions become real questions: more humans, more agents, or different work.
By capability, the share of the surface served by agents vs. humans. Where coverage is high and override rates are low, the model is earning its keep. Where the override rate is climbing, the human work is the safer bet.
Plan FY27 with the agents counted. Hire 12 in CS — or expand the agent's scope and hire 7 plus invest in evals. The plan model is the same shape; the trade-off is finally visible.
A workforce plan that ignores the agents in the building is a plan that's already wrong.
Node — Workforce product principles
Node maps how your business works and how software supports it — so every decision is grounded in what's real.
Book a demo